Of the three purposes of writing, to inform, entertain, and enlighten,
which one should come first? Such is the question I ask myself and
answer from the point of view of a thinker. Also, what is the role of a
reader when reading the thoughts of a thinker? Read on and find out.
Let us examine the three purposes of writing: to inform, entertain, and
enlighten. To me, the second one is bottom of the list, though it is
instrumental in the achievement of the two others. Every great teacher
knows this intimately and readily laces his teachings with relevant and
interesting stories, and humor.
The first purpose, to inform, comes second in my mind, whereas the
last, to enlighten, comes first. To explain my attitude, I think it
appropriate to draw your attention to my book A REASON FOR LIVING,
where both of these purposes are pursued.
Part of my book relays factual or theoretical information about things
like human physiology, nutrition, and universal evolution. This
information relates to the current perception of reality in scientific
circles. I am just a vehicle for it. Now, for two reasons, my role as a
writer who informs his readers about scientific facts and theories
comes second in my mind to my role as a philosopher who strives to
enlighten his readers.
My main reason is that I regard wisdom as paramount, whereas the
knowledge of the material world (i.e., the constituents, structure, and
workings thereof) is not equally important, however useful it is on a
practical level. Conscience comes before science, which in itself is
incapable of providing humans with a sense of what is good, right, or
sacred – in a word, with moral principles. An example of science
without conscience is the destruction of nature and the violation of
human rights by rogue companies who are efficient in their use, or
rather abuse, of their environment and their workers to satisfy their
greed.
My other reason is that my role as a writer who informs his readers
about scientific facts and theories is indeed that of a mere vehicle.
It is very much secondary to the role of researcher, which drives the
scientific enterprise thanks to advanced instrumentation plus skillful,
scholarly, and clever observations and rationalizations.
By contrast, my role as a philosopher who strives to enlighten his
readers is in the driver's seat, so to speak. Not only is it concerned
with everything that makes life worth living and gives humans a sense
of purpose, but also it does more than mirror the light of wisdom; it
generates it by force of thinking on the basis of experience and study.
Truth to tell, my readers can likewise think for themselves. They
themselves can be philosophers and create their own wisdom while
discovering and evaluating mine. Therefore, the light shining through
in my book is there to help my readers see a range of weighty matters
on which they can meditate to form their own thoughtful opinions about
them. And since they can do so, I venture to argue that they should.
Laurent Grenier’s career as a writer and philosopher spans over twenty
years. During this time he has broadened and deepened his worldview,
through much reflection and study, and in the end has crafted A REASON
FOR LIVING, his best work to date.
Official web site: laurentgrenier.com/ARFL.html